Announcement PDF ASX RELEASE 31 AUGUST 2023 MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE HIGHLIGHTS • Shallow interval of mineralisation from hole MTD026 was sampled for aqua regia testwork • Comparison of nickel assay by four acid (4A) versus aqua regia (AR) digest suggests high percentage of nickel in sulphide form versus silicate nickel • Intersection demonstrates better than 98% similarity in assay results: MTD026 Four Acid 130m at 0.305% Ni, 136ppm Co, 122ppm Cu from 116m Aqua Regia 130m at 0.300% Ni, 132ppm Co, 121ppm Cu from 116m • Shallow intersection of mineralisation was selected from the top 250 vertical metres of the hole amenable to open pit mining • Similar results previously seen in holes MTD012, MTD022 and MTD023 - showing shallow zone of nickel sulphide mineralisation could extend ~2.3km across Mulga Tank Complex • Potential for Mulga Tank to host very significant volumes of nickel in sulphide form Western Mines Group Ltd (WMG or Company) (ASX:WMG) is pleased to update shareholders on aqua regia testwork results from the Mulga Tank Ni-Cu-PGE Project. Assay results have been received for the shallow interval of nickel sulphide mineralisation recently observed from hole MTD026. Similar work was previously conducted on hole MTD020 (ASX, MTD020 Assays Confirm Extensive Working Mineral System, 7 November 2022) and holes MTD012, MTD022 and MTD023 (EIS1) (ASX, Aqua Regia Testwork Confirms Nickel Sulphide Association, 6 April 2023). A comparison of nickel assay results by four acid versus aqua regia digest was undertaken. Four acid is considered a near total digestion technique that breaks down most silicate and oxide minerals whereas aqua regia is considered a partial digestion technique that does not dissolve silicate minerals but does dissolve soluble sulphide minerals. The results of the comparison testwork suggests a high percentage of nickel in sulphide form versus silicate nickel, with the 130m intersection showing better than 98% similarity in results. These are very positive results indicating nickel is very likely predominantly associated with sulphide mineralisation. Broad intervals of shallow mineralisation (within the top 250 vertical metres) have now been tested by this method in four drill holes over some 2.3km. Assuming this mineralisation is laterally continuous, these results demonstrate the potential for the Complex to host significant volumes of nickel in sulphide form within a large near surface, open pit scenario for the Mulga Tank Project. Western Mines Group Ltd Level 3, 33 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 ASX:WMG Telephone: +61 475 116 798 Email: contact@westernmines.com.au www.westernmines.com.au Shares on Issue: 60.55m Share Price: $0.475 Market Cap: $28.76m Cash: $3.27m (30/06/23) 1 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE Commenting on the aqua regia results, WMG Managing Director Dr Caedmon Marriott said: “This basic comparison testwork has now been completed on five holes showing significant intersections of disseminated sulphide mineralisation and attempts to further prove the disseminated nickel mineralisation at Mulga Tank is hosted in potentially recoverable sulphide form - these very positive results clearly demonstrate it likely is. We’re conscious of exploring by economics and deliberately selected shallow intervals found in the top few hundred vertical metres that could be amenable to a large scale open pit scenario. Shallow intersections from four holes, MTD012, MTD022, MTD023 and MTD026 appear laterally continuous over some 2.3km, though a lot of further drilling is required to confirm this. Even considering just these uppermost intersections, the drilling results to date show the potential for the Mulga Tank Complex to host large volumes of nickel in sulphide form. Further infilling drilling is planned to test the continuity, with a potentially very significant shallow nickel sulphide resource there for us to go after.” FOUR ACID AND AQUA REGIA DIGEST COMPARISON Samples from the shallow interval of mineralisation seen in hole MTD026 were submitted for further analysis by aqua regia digest in addition to the previous four acid digest analysis. Similar comparison work was previously undertaken on the broad intersection of mineralisation seen in hole MTD020 (ASX, MTD020 Assays Confirm Extensive Working Mineral System, 7 November 2022) and holes MTD012, MTD022 and MTD023 (EIS1) (ASX, Aqua Regia Testwork Confirms Nickel Sulphide Association, 6 April 2023). Four acid digestion uses a combination of nitric, perchloric and hydrofluoric acid with a final dissolution stage using hydrochloric acid. This digestion breaks down most silicate and oxide minerals allowing for the “near-total” analysis of most minerals. In comparison, aqua regia digestion is a partial digestion technique using nitric and hydrochloric acid. Aqua regia is less aggressive and does not dissolve silicate minerals and, as such, silicate associated nickel minerals such as that within olivine should not be dissolved to any significant degree. A semi-quantitative assessment or comparison can be conducted on the two techniques to indicate the proportion of nickel mineralisation associated with sulphide (and potentially iron), relative to that of nickel in silicate (which is typically unrecoverable during beneficiation processing). The results of this comparison testwork demonstrate very encouraged results for the interval selected with better than 98% similarity in results - indicating nickel is predominantly associated with sulphide mineralisation. HOLE MTD026 Ninety-four, mostly 1m and 2m samples, were selected from hole MTD026 covering the interval of significant disseminated nickel mineralisation between 116m to 246m depth downhole (130m at 0.31% Ni, 136ppm Co and 122ppm Cu) as well as less well mineralised samples either side. The aqua regia assay results for this interval appear to indicate predominant nickel in sulphide with better than 98% similarity in the results (Table 1): Four Acid 130m at 0.305% Ni, 136ppm Co, 122ppm Cu from 116m Aqua Regia 130m at 0.300% Ni, 132ppm Co, 121ppm Cu from 116m ASX:WMG www.westernmines.com.au 2 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE Figure 1: MTD026 Comparison of four acid (4A) versus aqua regia (AR) assay results PREVIOUS AQUA REGIA TESTWORK Similar comparison work was previously undertaken on the broad intersections of mineralisation seen in holes MTD012, MTD020, MTD022 and MTD023 (ASX, MTD020 Assays Confirm Extensive Working Mineral System, 7 November 2022; Aqua Regia Testwork Confirms Nickel Sulphide Association, 6 April 2023). The aqua regia assay results for the intervals from all of these holes showed better than 97% similarity in results and indicated predominant nickel in sulphide form (Table 1): Four Acid HoleID From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Co (ppm) Ni (%) Aqua Regia Cu (ppm) Ni (%) Ni AR/ 4A Co (ppm) Co AR/ 4A Cu (ppm) Cu AR/ 4A MTD012 177 227 50 0.32 124 25 0.31 97.1% 115 92.8% 25 100.0% MTD022 108 192 84 0.32 128 49 0.32 99.9% 123 96.0% 49 100.0% MTD023 118 196 78 0.28 131 70 0.27 97.2% 124 94.3% 70 99.8% MTD026 116 246 130 0.31 136 122 0.30 98.6% 132 97.6% 121 99.6% Table 1: Summary of four acid (4A) versus aqua regia (AR) assay results DISCUSSION In the absence of magmatic sulphide processes nickel is incorporated into olivine during crystallisation and essentially trapped within the dunite host rock. Whereas, in “live” sulphur saturated mineral systems the nickel will partition into potentially “recoverable” nickel sulphide form. This simple comparison testwork attempts to provide a semi-quantitative analysis of the proportion of nickel in sulphide, relative to silicate nickel. Better than 98% similarity in the interval assays by the two digestion techniques was seen in hole MTD026 and better than 97% similarity was previously seen for holes MTD012, MTD020, MTD022 and MTD023 (ASX, Aqua Regia Testwork Confirms Nickel Sulphide Association, 6 April 2023; MTD020 Assays Confirm Extensive Working Mineral System, 7 November 2022). ASX:WMG www.westernmines.com.au 3 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE These very positive results suggest nickel is likely predominantly associated with sulphide mineralisation. From the limited drilling to date similar broad intervals of shallow disseminated mineralisation, within the top 250 vertical metres, have been seen across holes MTD012-MTD022-MTD023-MTD026 approximately 2.3km apart. These uppermost shallow intersections are potentially amenable to a large scale open pit scenario and were deliberately selected for this initial testwork, being mindful of potential economics whilst exploring. Together these holes begin to hint at the possible lateral extent of this mineralisation but a lot more infill drilling will be required to confirm this. The advantage in targeting this shallow zone is it is could be fairly rapidly drilled out with RC drilling in parallel with the ongoing deeper diamond drilling for massive sulphide targets. The feasibility of this will be tested over the next few months. Figure 2: Cross Section through the western side of the Mulga Tank Ultramafic Complex through holes MTD012 to MTD026 These early stage exploration results are starting to show the potential for the Mulga Tank Complex to host very significant volumes of nickel in sulphide form. The Company looks forward to updating shareholders on the continuing progress as this exciting drilling program develops. For further information please contact: Dr Caedmon Marriott Managing Director Tel: +61 475 116 798 Email: contact@westernmines.com.au This announcement has been authorised for release to the ASX by Dr Caedmon Marriott, Managing Director ASX:WMG www.westernmines.com.au 4 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE ABOUT WMG Western Mines Group Ltd Western Mines Group Ltd (ASX:WMG) is a mineral exploration company driven by the goal ACN 640 738 834 Level 3, 33 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 to create significant investment returns for our shareholders through exploration and discovery of high-value gold and nickel sulphide deposits across a portfolio of highlyprospective projects located on major mineral belts of Western Australia. Our flagship project and current primary focus is the Mulga Tank Ni-Cu-PGE Project, a Board Rex Turkington Non-Executive Chairman Dr Caedmon Marriott Managing Director major ultramafic complex found on the under-explored Minigwal Greenstone Belt. Exploration results show significant evidence for an extensive working nickel sulphide mineral system and is considered highly prospective for Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation. The Company’s primary gold project is Jasper Hill, where WMG has strategically Francesco Cannavo Non-Executive Director consolidated a 3km mineralised gold trend with walk-up drill targets. WMG has a diversified Dr Benjamin Grguric Technical Director Leonora in the heart of the WA Goldfields; Youanmi (Au), Pavarotti (Ni-Cu-PGE), Rock of Capital Structure Shares: 60.55m Options: 21.12m Share Price: $0.475 Market Cap: $28.76m Cash (30/06/23): $3.27m Follow us portfolio of other projects including Melita (Au, Cu-Pb-Zn), midway between Kookynie and Ages (Au), Broken Hill Bore (Au) and Pinyalling (Au, Cu, Li). COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results and other technical information complies with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) and has been compiled and assessed under the supervision of Dr Caedmon Marriott, Managing Director of Western Mines Group Ltd. Caedmon is a Member of the Australian Institute of @westernmines Geoscientists, a Member of the Society of Economic Geologists and a Member of the westernmines Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. He has sufficient experience that is relevant Western Mines Group to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code. Caedmon consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. DISCLAIMER Some of the statements appearing in this announcement may be in the nature of forward looking statements. You should be aware that such statements are only predictions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. Those risks and uncertainties include factors and risks specific to the industries in which WMG operates and proposes to operate as well as general economic conditions, prevailing exchange rates and interest rates and conditions in the financial markets, among other things. Actual events or results may differ materially from the events or results expressed or implied in any forward looking statement. No forward looking statement is a guarantee or representation as to future performance or any other future matters, which will be influenced by a number of factors and subject to various uncertainties and contingencies, many of which will be outside WMG’s control. WMG does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after today's date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information, opinions or conclusions contained in this announcement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of WMG, its Directors, employees, advisors or agents, nor any other person, accepts any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information contained in this announcement. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward looking statement. The forward looking statements in this announcement reflect views held only as at the date of this announcement. ASX:WMG www.westernmines.com.au 5 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE MULGA TANK PROJECT JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION - TABLE 1 SECTION 1: SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA Criteria Sampling techniques JORC Code explanation Commentary • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, • Diamond core drilling was completed using random chips, or specific specialised industry standard industry best practice standard measurement tools appropriate to the • NQ2 diamond core was cut in half or quarters minerals under investigation, such as down hole and sampled on either geological or whole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). metre intervals. Samples will be crushed and These examples should not be taken as limiting the pulverised to produce a sub-sample for broad meaning of sampling. analysis by either multi-element ICP-AES (MEICP61 and ME-ICP41), precious metals fire • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration assay (Au-AA25 or PGM-ICP23) and loss on of any measurement tools or systems used. ignition at 1,000°C (ME-GRA05) Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that • • Portable XRF data collected at 50cm sample are Material to the Public Report. point spacing downhole, with a 20 second beam time using 3 beams In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been • done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse • Model of XRF instrument was Olympus Vanta circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples M Series from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Drilling techniques • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole • Diamond drilling comprised NQ2 core hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) • The core was orientated using a downhole and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, orientation tool at the end of every run depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip • Diamond core recoveries were logged and sample recoveries and results assessed. recorded in the database. Overall recoveries were reported at >95% with no core loss Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and • issues or significant sample recovery problems ensure representative nature of the samples. Diamond core was reconstructed into • Whether a relationship exists between sample • continuous runs on an angle iron cradle for recovery and grade and whether sample bias may orientation marking. Depths were checked have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/ against the depth given on the core blocks coarse material. and rod counts were routinely carried out by the drillers • Some portions of the core with visible sulphide veining were quartered and removed for thin section and sulphide characterisation work, this biased selection of mineralisation may result in underreporting of grade ASX:WMG www.westernmines.com.au 6 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been • Information on structure type, dip, dip geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of direction, alpha angle, beta angle, texture, detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource shape and fill material were collected and estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. stored in the database Logging of diamond core recorded lithology, Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in • • mineralogy, mineralisation, structural, nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. weathering, colour, and other features of the • The total length and percentage of the relevant samples. Core was photographed in both dry intersections logged. and wet form • Drillhole was logged in full, apart from rock roller diamond hole pre-collar intervals Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half • Core was cut in half and sampled on either or all core taken. geological intervals or 1 or 2 metre lengths for geochemical assay If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, • etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • Some portions of the core with visible sulphide veining were quartered and removed for thin • For all sample types, the nature, quality and section and sulphide characterisation work appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Samples were crushed and pulverised to • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub• produce a sub-sample for analysis by either sampling stages to maximise representivity of multi-element ICP-AES (ME-ICP61 or MEsamples. ICP41), precious metals fire assay (Au-AA25 or • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is PGM-ICP23) and loss on ignition at 1,000°C representative of the in-situ material collected, (ME-GRA05) including for instance results for field duplicate/ • Sample sizes are considered appropriate for second-half sampling. the grain size and style of sulphide • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain mineralisation targeted size of the material being sampled. • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the • Samples analysed by four-acid digest multiassaying and laboratory procedures used and element ICP-AES (ME-ICP61) or precious whether the technique is considered partial or total. metals fire assay (Au-AA25 or PGM-ICP23) are considered total or near total techniques For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF • instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining • Samples analysed by aqua regia digest multithe analysis including instrument make and model, element ICP-AES (ME-ICP41) is considered a Quality of reading times, calibrations factors applied and their partial technique of soluble sulphide assay data derivation, etc. and laboratory • Standards representative of the grade of tests mineralisation anticipated were inserted • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory approximately every 20-25 samples (4-5%) checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy • ALS also follow their own QA/QC procedures (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. using standards and blacks • No issues with the assay data have been observed Verification of sampling and assaying ASX:WMG • The verification of significant intersections by either • Significant reported assay results were verified independent or alternative company personnel. by multiple alternative company personnel • The use of twinned holes. • Assay data was compiled into a SQL database server • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. www.westernmines.com.au 7 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE Criteria Location of data points Data spacing and distribution JORC Code explanation Commentary • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill • Drill holes located using a handheld GPS with holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine accuracy of +/-3m, downhole surveys used workings and other locations used in Mineral continuous gyro readings at 5m intervals Resource estimation. • Coordinates are in GDA94 UTM Zone 51 • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • The drilling completed was reconnaissance in nature designed to test specific geological and • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient geophysical targets for first pass exploration to establish the degree of geological and grade purposes only continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and O re R e s e r v e e s t i m a t i o n p ro c e d u re ( s ) a n d • No sample compositing classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves • The drilling was planned to be approximately unbiased sampling of possible structures and the perpendicular to the interpreted stratigraphy extent to which this is known, considering the deposit and footwall contact Orientation of type. data in relation to geological • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and structure the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Sample security Audits or reviews • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • Samples core was delivered to the laboratory by company personnel • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling • No audits or reviews of drilling sampling techniques and data. techniques or data by external parties at this stage of exploration • An internal review of sampling techniques and data will be completed SECTION 2: REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and • Tenement E39/2132, tenement applications ownership including agreements or material issues E39/2223 and E39/2299 with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, • Held 100% by Western Mines Group Ltd overriding royalties, native title interests, historical • 1% NSR to original tenement holder sites, wilderness or national park and environmental • Native Title Claim by Upurli Upurli Nguratja not settings. yet determined • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting No known historical or environmentally • along with any known impediments to obtaining a sensitive areas within the tenement area licence to operate in the area. • Tenement is in good standing Exploration done by other parties • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by • Previous exploration over the Mulga Tank other parties. project area by various companies dates back to the 1980s • Of these, more detailed exploration was completed by BHP Minerals Pty Ltd (1982– 1984), MPI Gold Pty Ltd (1995–1999), North Limited (1999–2000), King Eagle Resources Pty Ltd (2004–2012), and Impact (2013–2018) ASX:WMG www.westernmines.com.au 8 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of • The geology of the project area is dominated mineralisation. b y t h e i r re g u l a r s h a p e d M u l g a Ta n k serpentinised metadunite intrusive body measuring ~5km x 5km, hosted within metasediments, mafic to felsic schists and foliated metagranite of the northwest trending Archean Minigwal Greenstone Belt • Previous drilling intersected disseminated and narrow zones of massive nickel-copper sulphide mineralisation within the dunite intrusion • The intrusion is concealed under variable thicknesses of cover (reported up to 70 m in places) with the interpretation of the bedrock geology based largely on aeromagnetic data and limited drilling Drill hole information • A summary of all information material to the • A listing of the drill hole information material to understanding of the exploration results including a the understanding of the exploration results tabulation of the following information for all Material provided in the body of this announcement drill holes: • The use of any data is recommended for indicative purposes only in terms of potential • easting and northing of the drill hole collar Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation and for developing • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above exploration targets sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the • basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging • No metal equivalent values have been quoted techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade • Results where stated have been normalised to truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off a volatile free sample based on the LOI at grades are usually Material and should be stated. 1,000°C results using the formula M(VF) = M / (100%-LOI%) • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the • The drillhole was oriented to intersect reporting of Exploration Results. perpendicular to the mineralisation or stratigraphy If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to • the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be • The relationship of the downhole length to the reported. true width is not known • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and • Appropriate maps, photos and tabulations are tabulations of intercepts should be included for any presented in the body of the announcement significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. ASX:WMG www.westernmines.com.au 9 ASX RELEASE | MTD026 AQUA REGIA TESTWORK CONFIRMS NICKEL SULPHIDE Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration • Reporting of significant intersections in Table 2 Results is not practicable, representative reporting of • Reporting of majority of all sample results on both low and high grades and/or widths should be charts within the document practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Other substantive exploration data • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, • Not applicable should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg • Future exploration planned includes further drill tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or testing of targets identified large-scale step-out drilling). • Exploration is at an early stage and future drilling areas will depend on interpretation of • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological results interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. ASX:WMG www.westernmines.com.au 10